Analysis of Measurement of Readiness and Success of E-Learning Using The Method of Technology Readiness and Acceptance Model (TRAM) at The Islamic University of Darul Ulum Lamongan

Authors

  • Yunia Putri Wardayanti Sunan Ampel State Islamic University Surabaya
  • Faris Muslihul Amin Sunan Ampel State Islamic University Surabaya
  • Andi Permadi Sunan Ampel State Islamic University Surabaya

Keywords:

e-learning, TRAM, technology acceptance model, technology readiness index, optimism, innovation, discomfort, insecurity, perceived ease of use, perceived usefulness, intention to use

Abstract

E-Learning has a significant impact on the education system by discontinuing traditional learning activities and being replaced with a Distance Learning system. This study aims to determine the measurement of readiness and success of the implementation of the E-Learning system at the Islamic University of Darul Ulum Lamongan which is an important component in readiness and success and to provide recommendations for improvement based on the results of the evaluation of readiness and success carried out. The questionnaires were distributed to two groups of respondents, namely students and lecturers. Determination of the sample is 125 respondents from the student group and 116 respondents from the lecturer group. Quantitative approach method using PLS-SEM data analysis technique with SmartPLS version 3.0. Factors that influence the measurement of e-learning readiness are optimism, innovation, discomfort and insecurity. The factors that influence the measurement of the success of e-learning are perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use or ease of use, intention to use. The results of the comparison of lecturer and student tests show that there are several hypotheses that have a positive influence and some have a negative influence. There is a rejection of the hypothesis because the effect is not significant.

References

Abdillah, W. (2017). Metode Penelitian Terpadu Sistem Informasi. ANDI, Yogyakarta.

Alias, N. & Zainuddin, M. (2005). Innovation for better teaching and learning: Adopting the earning management system. Malaysian Online Journal of Instructional Technology, 2(2), 27-40.

Allen, M., Bourhis, J., Burrell, N., & Mabry, E. (2002). Comparing Student Satisfaction With Distance Education to Traditional Classroomsin Higher Education: A Meta-Analysis. American Journal of Distance Education, 16(2), 83-97.

Aparicio, M., Bacao, F. & Oliveira, T. (2016). An E-Learning Theoretical Framework, Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 19(1), 292–307.

Arbaugh, J. B. (2001). How Instructor Immediacy Behaviours Affect Student Satisfaction and Learning in Web-Based Courses. Business Communication Quarterly, 64(2), 42-54.

Areti, V. (2006). Satisfying distance education students of the Hellenic Open University. E-mentor, 2 (14), 1-12.

Arifin, S. & E. A. Sinambela. (2021). Studi tentang Kinerja Karyawan ditinjau dari Keberadaan Sistem Informasi Akuntansi dan Pengendalian Internal, Jurnal Akuntansi Realible, 1(1), 58-70.

Darmawan, D. (2012). Manajemen Informasi, Metromedia, Surabaya.

Davis, F.D. (1989). Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology. MIS quarterly, 13, 319-340. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008.

Ermawati, A. (2018). Pengaruh Brand Image Dan Brand Trust Terhadap Purchase Decision Produk United. Jurnal Agora, 6(2), 287097.

Farideh, H., M. Maryam, R. Maryam & J. Mehdi. (2011). Information Technology in Education. Procedia Computer Science, 3, 369-375.

Gunawan, A., Yuliana, D. Darmawan, & S. Arum. (2012). Manajemen Terapan dan Bisnis, Spektrum Nusa Press, Jakarta.

Halizah, S. N., E. Retnowati, D. Darmawan, R. K. Khayru, & F. Issalillah. (2022). Determinants of Customer Trust: A Study on Safety, Ease-of-use, and Perceived Usefulness of Herbal Products of Kuku Bima Ener-G, Journal of Trends Economics and Accounting Research, 2(4), 86-92.

Handayani, T., & Sudiana, S. (2015). Analisis Penerapan Model UTATUT (Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology) Terhadap Perilaku Pengguna Sistem Informasi. Semnas Re TII ke-10 2015.

Handayani. (2005) . Analisis Faktor-Faktor Yang Mempengaruhi Minat Pemanfaatan Sistem Informasi dan Penggunaan Sistem Informasi. Universitas Diponegoro Semarang.

Jogiyanto. (2007). Sistem Informasi Keperilakuan. Penerbit ANDI. Yogyakarta

Lazuardi, A. (2013). Tingkat Kesiapan (Readiness) Pengapdosian Teknologi Informasi. Karya Akhir Universitas Indonesia 2013.

Lin, C.H., Shih, H.Y, & Sher, P.J. (2007). Integrating technology readiness into technology acceptance: The TRAM model. Psychology and Marketing, 3(3), 641-657.

Lipaj, D., & Davidaviciene, V. (2013). Information System, 5(1), 38-45. https://doi.org/103846/mla.2013.06

Mahyanalia, R., K. S. Siagian, D. Darmawan, A. Gunawan & S. Arum. (2017). Job Insecurity and an Integrative Review for Future Research, Journal of Management, 43(6), 1911–1939.

Mardikaningsih, R., A. Gunawan, D. Darmawan & A. Karina. (2015). Manajemen, Teknologi, dan Bisnis, Addar Press, Jakarta.

Mardikaningsih, R. & D Darmawan. (2020). Sistem Pengendalian Mutu. Metromedia, Surabaya.

Mardikaningsih, R. & D. Darmawan. (2021). Peranan Sistem Informasi Persediaan terhadap Persepsi Kemudahan Penggunaan, Kegunaan Yang Dirasakan, dan Kepuasan Pengunjung Toko Buku. Realible Accounting Journal, 1(1), 43-57.

Moore, J. L., Dickson-Deane, C. & Galyen, K. (2011). E-Learning, Online Learning, and Distance Learning Environments: Are They the Same? The Internet and Higher Education, 14(2), 129–135.

Ngai, E. W., Poon, J. K. L. & Chan, Y. H. (2007). Empirical examination of the adoption of WebCT using TAM. Computers & Education, 48(2), 250–267.

Noesgaard, S. S., & Herngreen, R. (2015). The effectiveness ofe-learning: An explorative and integrative review of thedefinitions, methodologies and factors that promote e-Learningeffectiveness. Electronic Journal of E-Learning, 13(4), 278-290.

Parasuraman, A. (2000). Index (TRI) A Multiple-item Scale to Embrace New Technologies. Journal of Service Research,2.

Parasuraman, A. & C. L. Colby. (2015). An Updated and Streamlined Technology Readiness Index: TRI 2.0. Journal of service Research, 18(1), 59-74. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094670514539730

Pasuraman, A., dan Colby, C.L. (2000). Technology Readiness Index (TRI) a multiple-item scale to measure readiness to embrace new technologies. Journal of Service Research.

Rosenberg, M. J. (2001). e-Learning: strategies for delivering knowledgein the digital age, McGraw-Hill, New York.

Sinambela, E. A. & D. Darmawan. (2011). Analisis Dampak Penerapan Sistem Informasi Akuntansi terhadap Kualitas Laporan Keuangan melalui Sistem Pengendalian Internal Sebagai Variabel Intervening, Jurnal Ekonomi dan Bisnis, 1(1), 18-29.

Sinambela, E. A. & A. Basjari. (2012). Pengaruh Sistem Informasi Akuntansi terhadap Kinerja Karyawan, Jurnal Ilmiah Merdeka Ekonomi, 1(2), 153-164. Darmawan, D. (2008). Sistem Informasi Manajemen, Badan Penerbit Mahardhika, Surabaya.

Sun, P. C., Tsai, R. J., Finger, G., Chen, Y. Y., Yeh, D. (2008). whatdrives a successful e-learning? An empirical investigation of the criticalfactors influencing learner satisfaction. Computer & Education, 50, 1183-1202.

Suryani, & Hendryadi. (2015). Metode Riset Kuantitatif Teori dan Aplikasi pada Penelitian Bidang Manajemen dan Ekonomi Islam. Prenadamedia Group, Jakarta.

Teo, T. (2011). Factors influencing teachers’ intention to use technology: Model development and test. Computers & Education, 57(4), 2432–2440.

Usagawa, T. & Ogata, K. (2015). Potential of E-Learning for Enhancing Graduate and Undergraduate Education, IPTEK Journal of Proceeding Series (1), KS2-3-KS2-6.

van Raaij, Erik M. & Schepers, Jeroen J.L. (2008). The Acceptance and Use of a Virtual Learning Environment in China. Computers & Education, 50, 838–852.

Venkatesh, V. (2000). Determinants of Perceived Ease of Use: Integrating Control, Instrinsic Motivation, and Emotion into the Technology Acceptance Model, 19(7), 342-365.

Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B. & Davis, F. D. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 27, 425–478.

Walezuch, R., Lemmink, J., & Streukens, S. (2007). The effect of service employess’technology readiness on technology acceptance. Information and Management, 44(2), 206-215. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2006.12.005

Wang, Y., Wang, H. & Shee, D. (2007). Measuring e-learning systems success in an organizational context: Scale development and validation. A Computers in Human Behavior, 23, 1792–1808.

Yusup, F. (2018). Uji Validitas dan Reliabilitas Instrumen Penelitian Kuantitatif. Jurnal Tarbiyah : Jurnal Ilmiah Kependidikan, 7(1), 17–23. https://doi.org/10.18592/tarbiyah.v7i1.2100.

Zhang, D., & Nunamaker, J. F. (2003). Poweringe-learning in the new millennium: an overview of e-learning and enabling technology. Information Systems Frontiers, 5(2), 207–218.

Zhao, F. (2003). Enhancing the quality of online higher education throughmeasurement Quality Assurance in Education, 11(4), 214-221.

Downloads

Published

2022-08-26

How to Cite

Wardayanti, Y. P., Amin, F. M. ., & Permadi, A. . (2022). Analysis of Measurement of Readiness and Success of E-Learning Using The Method of Technology Readiness and Acceptance Model (TRAM) at The Islamic University of Darul Ulum Lamongan. International Journal of Service Science, Management, Engineering, and Technology, 2(1), 5–14. Retrieved from http://ejournalisse.com/index.php/isse/article/view/23